At first, the endgame was about boosting personalization to improve the mobile operator portals (that forced us to navigate through multiple menus) and cut the clicks to content that we genuinely appreciated. Typically, operators implemented personalization tools to bubble up cool content to the idle screen, taking the hassle out of finding and buying content on the device.

Fast forward, and on-portal is no longer where (all) the action is. The explosion in the number of app stores — software applications supermarkets run by handset makers, operators and independent players such as GetJar – increases our interest in finding stuff we like, and the sheer abundance of apps turns up the pressure on companies across the emerging ecosystem to make finding cool stuff a no-brainer.

By way of background, the content discovery dilemma was expertly outlined in a recent post by Alfred DeRose, who heads Tego Interactive, a Web and mobile product and services company specialized in integrated solutions for converged businesses determined to get more out of their digital assets. Working with clients to address a variety of issues around content discovery has allowed Tego to create a series of “cheat sheets” and white papers describing the problem and offering suggestions/solutions. So, watch this space.

PERSONALIZATION FOR THE PEOPLE

Put another way, content discovery is back at the top of the agenda and interest in personalization/recommendation technologies (to expose people to apps they are likely to appreciate) is also on the rise.

I know this from my interviews with vendors and operators, and from studying a raft of recent stats confirming (through app downloads) that we do indeed want more mobile stuff than ever. However, a disturbing hole in the argument has been (until this week) a lack of insight into what the people want.

Indeed, the underlying assumption has been that poor discovery (and even more miserable mobile search, as this in-depth post from my last mobile search master class shows) frustrates us (because we can’t find what we want) and forces mobile companies (operators/content owners and now developers) to leave money on the table.

So – how serious is the content discovery dilemma, really? Are people really frustrated? And would they buy more if it was easier?

NEW SURVEY

Thanks to a new survey of 2,666 mobile users in the U.S. and the U.K. — conducted by research firm TNS Global on behalf of Xiam Technologies, a Qualcomm subsidiary providing discovery and recommendations solutions to mobile operators – we finally have some thought-provoking stats.

The key data point: 80 percent of people experience some sort of problem getting stuff. The three biggest barriers: stuff is hard to find, phone and interface issues are a pain and the content is just plain irrelevant.

MOBILE SEARCH DOESN’T CUT IT

People are relying on mobile search to discover content, with some 68 percent using search engines to find what they want. 58 percent type in the URL. But – when it comes to effectiveness – people report URLs (83 percent) and bookmarks (89 percent) are the best ways to find content. Mobile search comes in a close third. Interestingly, 67 percent said the handset manufacturer portal was an effective way to find content; 67 percent said operator/service provider portals were effective.

Overall, people complained they are unsuccessful in accessing/purchasing (!) content they want 27 percent of the time.

WOULD PERSONALIZATION HELP?

In principle, it would. Assuming it was easier to find personalized stuff, almost 60 percent would spend more time accessing content and almost 40 percent would spend more money. Would people accept customized recommendations to find stuff they like? Approximately half of people survey in both the U.S. and the U.K. would accept suggestions.

HOW MUCH MONEY CAN BE MADE

Specifically, people said they would spend over an hour a week (55 percent increase) more accessing stuff with their mobile phones and over $8 per month (148 percent increase) if finding and buying was a no-brainer.

In addition to these consumer insights, the report is chock-full with interesting stats about the type of content people download (apps lead the pack) and pay for (games); top mobile sites (service provider destinations/portal trail the likes of Google, Yahoo, Facebook and the BBC); and the gripes people have about their providers (too pricey, too difficult to use and un-cool content).

MOBILE SOCIAL FUTURE

My personal thanks to Martin Clancy, Xiam Marketing Manager, for bringing my attention to the report (in a pre-briefing) and for arranging an interview with Colm Healy, Xiam CEO, to connect the dots. Naturally, much of this analysis is reserved for my report.

However, one exciting observation I can share is the pivotal importance of “significant others” (peers, friends, like-minded people) in the content app suggestions we can expect moving forward.

As Colm put it: The space is “in the eye of the storm.” App stores up the ante and force companies across the ecosystem to focus on personalization and recommendation as means to expose people to the stuff they are likely to appreciate and – ultimately – purchase.

App stores are the place to go – but what is going to keep us coming back for more?

Colm believes that social discovery will provide that stickiness. As he puts it: Recommendations from our friends will be the way we find apps.

But the challenge is not just in harnessing rants and raves from our peers to complement personalization and drive discovery. The real work is in creating recommendations that will work across the plethora of app stores coming on line. “There are unique challenges related to app store fragmentation. If I’ve discovered a great app on an iPhone, obviously what I want to do is let my friend know about that great app. But – if they have a different phone – then the question is how to direct them to the right app for that particular phone.”

Another trend high on Colm’s radar: apps to discover apps. As Colm sees it: Smartphones are chock-full of features and functionalities — clever technology that providers could/should harness to sell us on the wealth of apps at our finger tips. It’s all about taking advantage the interface and features such as location, the compass and the accelerometer (to name a few) to help people get to apps they would likely appreciate.

My take: Personalization has been at the center of mobile since the start. First people bought content (such as ringtones) to personalize their devices. Then companies implemented technology to deliver personalized suggestions and idle-screen takeovers as a way to help people navigate the avalanche of content and cut the clicks to content. It’s work in progress. Now the explosion of app stores pushes the content discovery issue back to the top of the agenda for operators, handset makers, developers – everyone. As this report shows, people would spend more time and money accessing stuff on their mobile phones if it were easier to do. Moving forward, people will likely not only appreciate personalized recommendations (particularly if they come from their peers). They may even come to expect them.

Disclaimer: MSG relies on Tego Interactive for the creation and integration of its online and mobile destinations/strategies. Xiam has aligned with MSG to publish a sponsored series of thought leadership columns and contributions beginning in December 2009.

Smartphones now account for one out of every seven phones, and Nielsen says that Blackberry gained the most smartphone market share during the period, up five points to 19 percent. Nokia’s woes continued, with its share of the total UK market down 7 percent to 44 percent. Source

The bottom line: If only 20 percent of UK mobile users are getting online with their phones, there’s still a lot of growth left in that market for content providers and mobile marketers.

—–

ONE IN SIX HANDSETS WILL HAVE NFC FUNCTIONALITY BY 2014, according to Juniper Research, as use spreads outside of Japan. The company says that in five years, the value of transactions processed over NFC worldwide will exceed $110 billion, with mobile payments and retail applications (such as coupons) the most widely used applications, though ticketing (such as for public transport) will also play a roll in pushing the rollout. Source

The bottom line: It seems like we’ve been waiting on NFC for a long time, and in the west, it’s never moved much past the trial stage and isn’t readily available in handsets. That’s one problem, but another is the cost of POS equipment for retailers, who won’t want to shell out for readers and other gear unless there’s really something valuable in it for them.

—–

CONSUMERS WHO RESPOND TO MOBILE MARKETING ARE MORE AVID USERS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES, says a new report from BIGresearch, and tend to be young men, the company says. It also adds that since its last study of US consumers in 2008, the percentage of people who don’t like to get SMS ads (66.8 percent), as well as the percentage of people who believe marketers need permission before sending mobile ads (58 percent), have increased. Source

The bottom line: With two-thirds of people saying they don’t like text ads, and almost 60 percent saying there needs to be opt-in, one message is clear: sending out blanket text ads (especially without permission) isn’t an effective use of mobile marketing.

—–

DESPITE THE MOBILE’S CONNECTION TO USER-GENERATED CONTENT, people prefer to watch professional video content on their handsets, according to research from Real Networks. It says that while YouTube is the most popular UGC video site on mobile, it’s eclipsed by content from pros (at least in the US), such as NBC, Fox, The Weather Channel, MTV, Comedy Central and ESPN.(Source: a Real Networks “mini-bulletin email)

The bottom line: One possible explanation for this is that users on mobile are task-focused: that is, they want to see what the weather is going to be, or they want to see a certain sports clip, and the professional content is better for that than something like YouTube. Also, the browsing and finding experience of the professionally curated content may be simpler than with many UGC sites on mobile. Or, it could simply be that many of these professional channels are accessed through a carrier portal, so they’re more prominent to users, or may work more reliably than some UGC sites.

Mobile Groove, the monthly podcast that focuses on the news and companies that matter most in mobile — is back with a great line-up of topics and the usual mix of insights and outspoken observations from co-host Inma Martinez, my über-connected and always professional partner in crime. (We missed posting on Friday, but the reason for the delay will be clear when I take the wraps off an all-new MSearchGroove, so watch this space.)

Mobilize, the conference Inma attended in September, left a lasting impression. Her SWOT analysis: a great line-up of startups and a high level of energy and VC activity in the Valley. Where does this leave Europe? Inma (also based in London) connects the dots in some recent investor reports and concludes Europe may see its best and brightest in mobile “defect.” Is the U.S. the place to be if you are a mobile entrepreneur? Listen in and let us know what you think.

Speaking of startups, Inma also outlines the highlights from Seedcamp, a program created to jumpstart the entrepreneurial community in Europe by connecting next generation developers and entrepreneurs with over 400 mentors from a top-tier network of company builders; including seed investors, serial entrepreneurs, product experts, HR and PR specialists, marketers, lawyers, recruiters, journalists and venture capitalists. One company that stood out: VouChaCha, a U.K. startup that delivers vouchers to your mobile phone. Where is the hold up in Europe and why aren’t coupons a de facto part of our daily mobile routines (as they are in the U.S.)? You tell us!

Other success stories Inma shares: Flirtomatic, iScoot and eBuddy.

CONTEXT MATTERS?

Will location-based services excite women? Well, we beg to disagree.

Listen to the lively podcast here [23:54].

What about women who are interested in bargains are willing to drive miles in pursuit of discounted designer clothes, for example. (Think of the success of outlets in the middle of nowhere?!) Will an app that tells women what’s on offer nearby fly or fail? And where are the female-focused apps anyway? Men may have their iPhone app that celebrates flatulence – but where are the apps that target women? Talk about leaving money on the table!

BLYK MEDIA & SOCIAL MEDIA

In a follow up to the last podcast Antti Öhrling, Blyk Co-Founder, joins Inma for lunch and the opportunity to explain Blyk’s real business objectives. It’s not about mobile advertising; it’s about mobile media. Inma tells us it is an ambitious model – but one that could work well for Blyk. Listen in and find out.

And we discuss the buzz around social media, giving Vodafone (and the fast-followers sure to make headlines in the next weeks/months) huge credit for Vodafone 360. Why is social media big in mobile? Inma tells us that part of the reason could be the popularity of Twitter on mobile. (She should know; when it comes to mobile London is the Twitter capital.)

We also revisit Spotify and dissect its mobile ambitions. Is it gearing up for a showdown with Apple? Listen in and let us know what you think.

RAISING OUR GOBLET

This time Inma salutes Mark Curtis, the mastermind behind Flirtomatic, a phenomenally successful freemium flirt and fun service.

Fresh from several mobile advertising events, I raise my goblet of rock to Dagmara Brylack for sharing a milestone mobile advertising case study during Mobile Marketing Forum Europe (which I analyze here). I also recognize Mark “Mr. Mobile” Wächter, for his work to launch MMA Germany. When it comes to mobile advertising, Germany is a potential powerhouse (!)  and future posts here on MSearchGroove will highlight the stats, campaigns and companies that make this market the one to watch.

Until next time – keep it fun!

PERSONAL THANKS

Our thanks to the Grant Butler Coomber team (and Billy Burnett) for their continued advice and support on how to build awareness of this podcast series and other MSearchGroove initiatives.  I fully recommend them as our PR team of choice if you want to build your brand in Europe. In the U.S. I am indebted to Jeff Fishburn (“always-on” at OnPR) and Liz Erk, whose agency, The Jaxson Group, also advises MSearchGroove. Her talent: securing major media placements and speaking engagements for client companies.

But most of all – thanks to you, our listeners. We welcome your ideas, suggestions and elevator pitches. DM us on Twitter (@mobilegroove) or email us at mobilegroove AT msearchgroove DOTcom.

Related posts:

PODCAST: Thought-Provoking Mobile Groove Series With Inma Martinez Debuts Today; Offers Inside Track On Industry Disasters, High-Flyers & What’s Highest On Investor Radars

The recent report on trends in location-aware apps from Apple’s App Store, Google’s Android Marketplace, and Blackberry’s App World released by Skyhook Wireless, itself a provider of a patented hybrid system of location awareness, reveals a buoyant market for LBS apps. Indeed, the Apple App Store was found to have the greatest number of location-based applications, at over 2,300, and the highest percentage of paid for location apps, at over 75 percent. 67 percent of Blackberry apps are paid, and 80 percent of Android Marketplace apps are free.

Clearly, location apps are popular, as their increasing ubiquity and popularity across a variety of app stores demonstrates. But move past the hype and the excitement generated by the flurry of activity in the space, and it becomes clear that location services – by themselves – are not game-changing.

Location-aware data is not enough

Indeed, mobile location-based services and social networking companies such as Loopt, Pelago, and Sense Networks have invested a great deal to achieve their vision, which revolves around the provision of an array of consumer and community services supported by socially-tagged, location-aware data stores. The data they have is impressive and the expansion plans they pursue are ambitious. However, they also face formidable competition from Internet giants (Google, MySpace, Facebook, and Yelp) that have already aggregated their own large sets of useful social content, and are anxious to extend their reach to mobile.

Can companies compete on location data? Many players are positioning themselves to do just this. However, I submit that location services – and the structures and systems in place to deliver them – represent little more than an incremental innovation on top of the immense stockpiles of location data and content that are largely under the control of established Web companies and heavyweights. As a result, these Web giants are well-positioned to leverage location data to mobilize their offers and ultimately dominate the marketplace. There are, however, options and strategies mobile location services companies can employ to win the game – even though, as I argue in this is column, location services on their own are far from game-changing.

Admittedly, not everyone shares my view. Sam Altman, founder of Loopt, told me in a recent interview that he strongly believes in the value of innovation in location-based services and their central position in personal mobility experiences. A prime example is the company’s iPhone app. Loopt’s Mix feature enables users -without compromising their personal privacy – to connect with other users nearby. What’s more, users can find places nearby on Yelp and find what their friends on Loopt are saying about those places.

Beyond this interesting user experience, Loopt’s location-related content is thin, and therefore isn’t terribly useful – yet. However, it’s not so much the company’s progress with their service offering that interests me as much as its business priorities.

Specifically, Loopt has correctly honed in on two features/functionalities which are fundamental to all location-based services moving forward.

1. Connecting users to each other (using location in addition to other social filtering parameters).
2. Connecting users to information (using location as an additional input to search).

The intersection between location and search on a mobile is particularly promising, and has caught the attention of location services providers including Loopt, Sense Networks (CitySense), and Pelago (Where service), as well as mobile search services providers including ChaCha, a company that connects users to a human agents trained to provide answers to their SMS text search queries and, more recently, voice-activated queries.

However, these players are all pursuing business models built around a broad but rather general vision of what location-based services are – and can be.

In their view, location can be to mobile search and social networking what PageRank currently is to Internet search. Put in this perspective, location is potentially disruptive. What’s more, the companies that control the data stores (thus the capabilities to connect users to information they require, and to each other) are positioned to rock the industry.

Location information is power, both to the companies that deliver it and the consumers, who benefit from the tremendous amount of utility it provides.

Love the restaurant where you just ate? Review it, post it online, and alert everyone (or just your friends) nearby to try the place, all while you’re waiting for the check. Want to find a good barber shop in Mountain View, California? Ask a question, direct it only to users in downtown Mountain View, and be alerted when you receive an answer from someone there. The immediacy, intimacy, relevance, and quality of such services make them very exciting for consumers.

And let’s not forget the potential for the delivery of more relevant, location-aware mobile advertising, which is the main attraction for local stores, clubs, restaurants, businesses, and organizations hoping to attract consumers to their premises.

The location tools and technologies used here to record what we do and where we are (all the while paying careful attention to personal privacy concerns) as part of our day-to-day routine provide advertisers, agencies, and mobile operators a potentially much deeper understanding of consumer habits, insights that can greatly increase the value of mobile advertising linked to location-based services. Mobile contextual advertising is already de rigueur, but location has the potential to make mobile advertising more relevant, more personalized, and thus much more effective.

But it doesn’t stop there. Adding location on top of traditional information sources we know from the Internet provides online companies with further opportunity to personalize content for their users on the move. Location can also boost the quality and value of online recommendations (where the system delivers suggestions based on an implicit understanding of user content preferences and requirements) and search (where an explicit query triggers the delivery of additional related results).

Why location-based services are an incremental innovation

Clearly, location services which connect users to each other, or information, or both have the best chances for success. However, there are several major obstacles that make this a difficult space for companies – particularly startups – to gain traction.

1. Users can resist change: Connecting users to each other and introducing them to new social networking communities could be tough, particularly if they are loyal to the communities where they are already members. The social networking space is already nearing saturation point, at least in the U.S. and the U.K.
2. User-generated content matters: Without a large data store of geotagged content, there is little value to a location-based service. Yelp and CitySearch, companies that have large data stores of reviews, listings, phone numbers, and shop information indexed by location, have the advantage here.
3. Search needs location: Developing effective mobile search will likely require heavy-duty algorithms and design (that factor location and context into the equation), and a large infrastructure to deliver.
4. Google is on an expansion course: Companies – particularly startups – face strong competition from Google. Latitude, a service that allows users to share their location with their friends on GTalk, can be read as Google’s bid for market supremacy. Is Google over-reaching? Not if we consider the company’s ability, through Latitude, to leverage legions of clusters for search to deliver more relevant information culled from a wider data set than any startup could ever stockpile. Furthermore, Google’s dominance in contextual advertising, which it is trying to extend to the mobile space, allows it to reach out to a wide network of advertisers and businesses eager to attract traffic to their sites and tap in to the potentially lucrative Long Tail of search queries. While even Google will have difficulties as it sharpens its focus on selling paid search advertising to the hyperlocal market, its brand recognition and reach may allow it to make considerable inroads and thus pose a significant threat to a broad mix of location services providers and mobile ad networks.
5. Brands need trust: Users are generally not accustomed to sharing their location data with brands and merchants. To convince consumers they trust brands with their personal information, all communications (particularly brand messages delivered via mobile marketing campaigns) will need to be permission-based and comply with the Global Code of Conduct, guidelines introduced by the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA), a global non-profit trade organization established to lead the growth of mobile marketing and its associated technologies. Put another way, brands best positioned to achieve their business objectives, and reach mainstream users instead of just early adopters, are ones that respect our privacy and have our respect. That narrows the candidates down to established big-name brands, companies that we know and trust.
6. Content without consent is spam: The avalanche of new content linked to contextual data (what we do and where) opens the door wide open to the delivery of spam and the spread of fraud. All companies have to do their utmost to attack this problem at the root. However, many startups will likely find they lack the infrastructure to keep this issue in check.

Put another way, making a mark in the location services space requires more than the ability to pick up on a user’s location. Location services require the professional and reliable interplay of systems and services enabling search, content delivery and discovery, social networking and communication, and mobile marketing and advertising. What’s more, players in this space must connect and collaborate with a complex value chain that includes advertisers, enablers, operators, consumers, and companies we have yet to identify.

Given these factors, the players that emerge dominant in this market are likely to be the names we know from the Internet: Facebook, MySpace, Google, and Yelp. Why? Because, as I have pointed out: It’s not about location; it’s about the data and the networks that power location services. Internet giants have experience, communities, content, and search. Location is just another ingredient they can add to their already successful recipe for success. Put simply, location serves as an additional input, paving the way for these companies to provide interesting new applications – applications that fundamentally leverage the assets already out there on the Web.

Smart strategies for clever newcomers

It may be a bleak picture that I paint for mobile location companies and startups; I would like to point out that I am a believer in the vision behind location based services. However, given my experience and common sense, I cannot ignore the barriers that prevent newcomers from changing the game.

But there are actions startups can take to ensure they nonetheless secure a central spot in the merging location services value chain. It may require a rethink, but the potential rewards make it well worth the effort.

I would therefore suggest startups refocus their strategy to bring more value to users, boost their competitiveness in the process. I would advise executing one of the following options:

1. Mashup: tackle the “cold start” problem and build up your data store (and follow the lead of services such as Loopt and Where) by providing content from larger Web services such as Yelp, Evite, Eventbrite, and CitySearch. It’s a great way to connect your users to valuable information immediately. What’s more, there’s an opportunity for one or two location-based “data aggregators” – companies that use information from other services and present it via a unified interface on the mobile device. (However, there is only room for a few companies in this space since the barriers to entry are low and little prevents Internet giants from entering the mobile space (on their own) themselves. Yelp and Google lead the group of Internet companies staking out their mobile territory by releasing location-aware apps for the iPhone and Android devices. A successful play in this niche would therefore require companies to outmaneuver both the mashups offered by other competitors aiming to be data aggregators and the individual siloed applications offered by the Internet companies that have the data and determination to play in mobile.
2. Killer search: It may seem unlikely, but search can be decisive and disruptive, particularly as the integration of location information will likely cause a seismic shift in how users interact with the results they receive on their mobile phone. Keep in mind that, when Google began promoting their brand of search engine, observers joked that the race had already been run and won by the likes of Lycos, HotBot, Yahoo, and AltaVista. My message: If a company makes a fundamental improvement in search by using location data, it would represent a sea-change in contextual search and shift the balance of power away from the current market leaders.
3. Big money: Location can enhance the value and effectiveness of advertising and marketing, adding a new dimension to how companies communicate their brand message to consumers. It may even be possible to use location information to provide better advertising that will appeal to users. As this recent post on MSearchGroove points out: Advertising is indeed content. Location can enable the delivery of truly compelling content. At the other end of the spectrum, we might ask ourselves if it is not possible that location could even pave the way for a whole new paradigm around the effective monetization of content and services that does not involve ad-funding. The value of receiving the right information at the right time and in the right context may be so valuable that people will pay for it.

In conclusion, a bright future awaits location services startups that think outside the box. Granted, it’s a tough market with ever tougher competition, but a strategy built on one (or all) of the options I present will help startups stand up to the Internet giants. I strongly believe location and location-based services are the future. I enjoy hearing about scrappy, ambitious startups, and their success should encourage all companies in this space to execute on the strategies I have outlined. The strategies may vary but the pay-off is clear: Companies that position themselves now to leverage the power of location will lead the way in delivering contextual relevance across mobile search, mobile advertising, and a potentially lucrative range of mobile services we cannot even imagine.

About the author:

Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/njanewit
Nate Janewit is a search and mobile technologist and a Silicon Valley resident. His career thus far has spanned Microsoft, Google, Kosmix, Efficient Frontier, and research in Japan and at Stanford. He is an analyst of emerging technology and media and actively contributes to developments in the search and search advertising space.

It’s early days and there are no easy answers – all the more reason to attend Mobile Advertising & the Rise of Social Networking: What does it mean for Brands, Agencies and Service Providers?, a Knowledge & Networking Seminar organized by AIME, (The Association for Interactive Media and Entertainment), this Thursday in London.  The seminar provides the perfect opportunity to explore key learnings with industry pioneers and network over drinks. (The event begins at 6:30 p.m. and wraps up around 11 p.m. More details on the program and venue here.)

One company I look forward to hearing is Flirtomatic, a pioneer mobile flirting service that has had great success monetizing mobile users through conversation with added fun and great content such as virtual flowers and kisses. The company recently extended its reach to enable members to give the objects of their affection real gifts including chocolate and sexy underwear. As Matt Dicks, Commercial Director for Flirtomatic, put it in an interview with AIME’s Andrew Darling: The approach to mobile advertising is about marketing entertainment and content services as part of its mobile social network. “It’s about integrating ads and brands into the fabric of a social networking service – enabling premium gifting between users and using advertising to support content.”

Other speakers on hand to share their experiences/vision include:

• Nandi Gurprasad, VP of Alliances, Bango
• Dusan Hamlin, Joint Managing Director, Inside Mobile
• Mark Brill, Chairman Mobile Council, DMA
• Henry Stevens, Director of Media and Entertainment, GSMA

I’ve been invited to present the results of my new-release white paper (Mobile Advertising For The Masses). In it I road test the mobile ad networks offered by three mobile social networks and document the results. (Look for the free download later on in the week.) I also conclude with my three principles for interacting with mobile social networkers on their terms. (After all, those are the rules here!)

1) Make the most out of mobile analytics offered both by the ad network and an independent vendor to match your marketing message/campaign with the community.

2)Consider virtual gifting and other schemes to provide something of value to users and their community.

3)Participate actively in the community and interact with members to build relationships and enable them to deepen their relationships with each other by providing tools that will let them do what they are there to do: Keep in touch with friends, connect with people who share their interests and share content and feelings with the community.

If you want to meet up or catch-up during the seminar, then please reach out to me directly, or contact Andrea Henninge (andrea@msearchgroove.com) to schedule a briefing.

Disclaimer: Bango is an MSG sponsor.

I used the opportunity to connect with some cool companies and mobile pundits, so check back for a line-up of exclusive briefings and in-depth analyses, beginning with a podcast with Bob Rosenshein, Answer.com CEO. In our audio interview, we discuss what makes for an optimal mobile search experience, and talk in broad terms about the company’s mobile strategy. Having just packed 100+ business cards and a stack of notebooks in my suitcase, it’s going to be tough choosing whom to showcase next, but be assured I will pick the gems.

My dear colleagues from bnetTV also covered the event, providing me the opportunity to do some impromptu interviews with Smaato, Nokia Interactive, David Berkowitz (Director of Emerging Media & Client Strategy at digital marketing agency 360i), and Mobify, a start-up that gets publishers around the pain and expense of making  a version of their website for mobile phones (and the iPhone) by enabling publishers to create “mobile views” of their existing destination. (I’ll have more about the company, and an interview with Igor Faletski, Mobify CEO, in a special post that outlines the process in a how-to that results in an iPhone version of MSG.)

A real highpoint of the conference: The chance to connect with Alan Moore, founding director of SMLXL (Small Medium Large XtraLarge), a specialist community and engagement marketing firm, and co-author of Social Media Marketing: How Data Analytics Helps to Monetize the User Base in Telecoms, Social Networks, Media and Advertising in a Converged Ecosystem. I’ll deep-dive into this work in a future podcast, but in the meantime allow me to leave you with a key bullet point from Alan’s presentation (and one that echoed across a string of post-session discussions): Advertising inventory as we know it is dead.

Think about it.

I have done nothing but since I heard Alan’s thought-provoking presentation, aptly titled No Straight Lines, yesterday.

Today I spent much of the day writing my regular column for EContent magazine, one that attempts to connect the dots in the many presentations and dinner conversations that have made this last week so remarkable and memorable. Thanks to Matthew for purposely ending the event with a bang: A session looking at the new services that harness Twitter (and its open API) to create new ways to create, access, organize, and mobilize this wealth of information and content.

My take (and the central message of my column): The trickle of Twitter-based services will surely become a tidal wave of offerings that range from news and media monitoring to innovative ways to organize the massive flow of information.

The session introduced us to some cool startups that have picked up on this, including StockTwits, which calls itself an “open, community-powered investment idea and information service.” More about this social, stock micro-blogging when I connect with Howard Lindzon, StockTwits Co-Founder. Also check back for some detail on how and why advertising may be the way forward for Twitter, ending the company’s search for a monetization model.

As I conclude in my column: We are – every single one of us – publishers. And with social networks such as Twitter we have the foundation for a new ecosystem in which individuals, content companies, and even brands can create new content and new ways to organize information in our socially inter-networked world.