I suspect his thought-provoking blog will do more than set the tone for my book; it will impact the app store debate that will likely dominate 2010. Just look at the recent raft of app announcements: Analyst firm IDC predicts there will be more than 300,000 iPhone apps by the end of next year, compared to 75,000 Android apps; Samsung takes the wraps off its Bada app platform; and (just today) Orange officially opens its app store to users in the U.K. and France, offering more than 5,000 apps for Java, Android, BlackBerry, Symbian and Windows Mobile.

Connect the dots, and the avalanche of apps turns up the pressure on providers and mobile operators to be good retailers and put stuff we’re likely to appreciate where we can find and buy it. Common sense really.

Or is it? Not is we consider the statement from Nenad Marovac, Managing Partner, DN Capital, who was speaking at Heroes of the Mobile Screen earlier this week, In his view, “Operators should be pipes and shut up.” Hmmm… not much room in that model for mobile operators to wield the stockpile of analytics they collect (such as our browsing patterns and past purchases) to present us with a selection of apps we’re likely to appreciate.

In preparation for my own industry report on personalization and recommendation I have spent the last weeks interviewing a who’s who of industry players and their customers (mobile operators/service providers) who are convinced  the company with the most (and best) data wins. It’s a battle between operators (really smart pipes) and aggregators (Google & Co.) – and personalization and recommendation could just be the capabilities that distinguishes the leaders from the also-rans.

With that in mind, we continue MSG’s special podcast series on the top players in personalization, and conclude with Part 2 of my interview with Stephen Oman, Amdocs ChangingWorlds Worldwide Director Sales Engineering. Changing Worlds is an Irish provider of personalization technology that was recently acquired by Amdocs and is now part of Amdocs Interactive.

In Part 1 we dissected the content discovery dilemma, looked at on-portal challenges and examined the results of the company’s recent study that underlined the importance of personalization in determining and delivering mobile advertising.

In part 2 we explore personalization off-portal and across app stores.

ROLE OF THE MOBILE OPERATOR: As Stephen sees it: the operator has a spot at the “center of the Internet.” Their job: “helping the subscriber to go on to the Internet, helping them find the right content, helping them with additional suggestions which they might be interested in, and so on.  In doing that, they’re becoming if you like a partner to the subscriber when they are browsing the internet.” So, there’s an opportunity here for the operator to “set themselves up in essence as the home page for the mobile Internet for their subscribers.”

APP STORES: In many ways, it’s a repeat of the content discovery problems we know from on-portal. But it’s also an issue that independent developers will also face as they try to engage people and compete with similar, rival apps across the store. As Stephen puts it: Making an effort to personalize the content will “help people find more niche types of applications that may exist, and that would never appear in the what’s hot today or what’s in the top 10 for today.”

LONG-TAIL VERTICAL APP SCHEMES: Reports show that many apps downloaded are actually productivity apps. Additionally, apps are being downloaded by professionals in line with their professions. So, will we see a plethora of app stores split across lines such as task (apps to do “x”) or jobs (apps for doctors, for example)? Stephen was intrigued by the idea and agrees that we will likely see the launch of vertical app stores (similar to the vertical content portals that offered only ringtones or wallpapers). “It’s pretty much the same as you see in retail, you do have retail stores that sell pretty much everything, but you also have niche retail stores that cater for particular audiences.”

THE GROWTH OPPORTUNITY: In a word: convergence. “Increasingly the mobile operators’ customers are expecting and demanding that if you like connected lifestyle….Crucially, they’re looking to be able to access services across many different devices: their mobile phone, online, through their TV, through digital TV, and that convergence of access is essentially going to improve and drive growth in the mobile digital economy.”

Editor’s note: This special focus on personalization and recommendation continues in the New Year with a look at a cool new recommendation company coming out of stealth mode and an analysis of Novarra. I had to reschedule this one a few times, but this time it is timed to some important news. Not one to miss!

Disclaimer: ChangingWorlds is not an MSG supporter.  However, MSG has published a by-lined thought leadership column authored by a ChangingWorlds senior executive. MSG has also participated in an invitation-only  thought leadership event organized by Amdocs.

Listen to the podcast here. [15:12]

Related posts:

PODCAST: ChangingWorlds Reveals Real Impact Of Personalization On Mobile Advertising CTRs; Google Shows Mobile Advertising Is Hot (Again), But Will Personalization Make The Market Sizzle?

SPECIAL REPORT: GETTING PERSONAL Openwave Adds Mobile Analytics; Are Gateway Providers The Ones To Watch? PLUS New Report/Project With GigaOM Pro

PODCAST: Bytemobile CMO Adrian Hall: Operators’ Can Win On Personalization; Does A Widget Bar Do One Better Than An App Store?

MSG DEBUT VIDEO: Xiam Talks Targeting & Filtering; Make Way For The Personalized Web!

GUEST COLUMN:Using Personalization To Pump Up The Volume & Increase The Value Of The Mobile Internet

While the iPhone OS was the leading smartphone platform on Millenial’s network, with 33 percent of smartphone share (ahead of BlackBerry’s 31 percent), Samsung was the top device maker, thanks to the predominance of featurephones. The company also said the US mobile web audience grew to 64.8 million users, and that its ad network reached nearly 80 percent of them.

The report also features a section on mobile app analytics, provided by Mobclix, which says that the iPhone App Store is the biggest on the block, with 115,000 apps, and also leads in downloads, with 100 million per month. Android Market is a distant second, with 20 million per month, and BlackBerry App World even further back in third, delivering 300,000 downloads per month.

Millienial adds that traffic to advertisers’ sites represented almost half of the mobile campaign destinations on its network in October, while app downloads accounted for about 30 percent. Source

The bottom line: Mobile web use – and the market for mobile ads – continues to grow. But don’t overlook smartphones, which still account for a huge chunk of the mobile web market.

—–
THE MOTOROLA DROID SOLD 250,000 UNITS IN ITS FIRST WEEK, according to GigaOM and based on a report from mobile analytics company Flurry. The new Android device, available only on Verizon Wireless in the US, has been well received by commentators, and now, apparently, by the market as well. Flurry says that the sales are more than four times those of T-Mobile’s MyTouch 3G in its first week of sales in August, but of course pale in comparison to the 1.6 million iPhone 3GS devices sold in its first week. Source

The bottom line: Is Motorola clawing its way back from the precipice? Could be – since software has long been its Achilles heel, turning to Android could turn out to be a smart choice, and one that saves the company.

—–

MORE THAN 3 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE UK HAVE REDEEMED A MOBILE COUPON, says Juniper Research in a new report. The analyst firm says that mobile coupons enjoy a redemption rate six times higher than traditional paper coupons, again highlighting the viability of mobile marketing to deliver results for advertisers and brands. Source

The bottom line: Mobile coupons seem like a no-brainer, if only because people are less likely to forget to bring their phone to a shop than a paper coupon! But combined with opt-in campaigns and any number of targeting techniques, they represent a valuable resource for retailers.

—–

THE NUMBER OF MOBILE SOCIAL NETWORKING USERS IN LATIN AMERICA AND AFRICA WILL INCREASE TENFOLD BY 2015, says a new report from analyst firm Frost & Sullivan and mobile social networking provider Colibria. F&S says the market will amount to 527 million users and be worth $2.4 billion in six years, reflecting the increased popularity of the services, but also the prevalence of mobile as an Internet channel in emerging markets. Source

The bottom line: It’s easy to predict the growth of mobile social networks, but anybody eyeing the space has to keep in mind how people in emerging markets use their mobiles and access the internet primarily through them.

The bottom line: If anything, these figures are conservative, since in some sense, all mobile users are part of a mobile social network: the one represented by their handset’s phonebook. This list of contacts is arguably users’ most important social network, and will increasingly meld with those of online social networking services, blurring the line between users and non-users.

—–

THE VALUE OF THE EUROPEAN CONNECTED VEHICLE MARKET WILL DOUBLE TO 6.2 BILLION EUROS BY 2013, says Telematics Update. The growth will be driven by the mandatory installation of eCall black-box devices in cars, as well as consumer interest in connected vehicle services. Additionally, the group expects insurance companies to take advantage of telematics in their consumer offerings. Source

The bottom line: Cars are increasingly getting connected to mobile data networks, generally for navigation and traffic services. Some content networks are emerging, particularly in the US, but the growth in telematics and connected cars could represent a significant opportunity for mobile developers and content providers.

—–

ANDROID IS GAINING MOBILE WEB MARKET SHARE,  say the latest metrics from the AdMob ad network, but iPhone remains on top, accounting for 40 percent of all the ad requests on its network worldwide. The company says Android is growing strongly in North America and Europe, and accounts for 13 percent of US ad requests from smartphones. The Palm Pre is also showing strong growth, accounting for 9 percent of US smartphone usage. Source

The bottom line: These stats show just how hungry the market is for devices that make browsing the web a breeze. The strong figures from the Pre, a device that’s not sustained its early buzz in the US, underlines this. Also, expect the Android share to keep growing as more and more devices running the platform hit the market.

—–

WORKING MOMS ARE A GOOD TARGET FOR MOBILE MARKETING, says a new report from Scarborough Research, based on their mobile usage and spending. It found that they spend $94 per month on average on their mobile bill each month, compared to the overall average of $78. In addition, the firm found that working moms are 42 percent more likely than the average mobile user to download content to their phone. It’s a decent market segment, too, accounting for 9 percent of the user adult population, or 11 percent of mobile users – 21.6 million. Source

The bottom line: Males aged 18-34 are often touted as one of the most desirable segments for marketers, but this research says they should take a look at working moms as well, particularly for mobile content. This makes some intuitive sense, as working moms generally have their hands full with work and their families, making the prime mobile users.

The firm adds that the mobile Internet audience in the U.S. is now a third of the size of the wired Internet market, with the gap narrowing by the early part of the next decade. Source

The bottom line: No big surprises here, but some good insight into US mobile usage – in particular, the mobile internet audience is already a big target market for content providers and advertisers.
***
DON’T FORGET BLACKBERRY WEB USERS, says mobile web firm Bango. The company says BlackBerrys now account for 14 percent of all mobile web traffic, pulling ahead of the iPhone. Given the length of time BlackBerry has been in the market, plus the fact that essentially every such device comes with an unlimited data plan, it’s perhaps a little more surprising that the iPhone was ever ahead of the entire BlackBerry range. Source

The bottom line: Once again, we’re reminded that the mobile web is a lot more than just the iPhone, and that users of other devices generate significant traffic for publishers and content providers. It’s also another reminder that fragmentation among devices and the multitude of mobile web browsers on the market isn’t going away anytime soon!

***
TWO-THIRDS OF TWITTER USERS ARE UNDER 25, says eMarketer – or at least they were in May – while a tiny group of the service’s users account for most of its activity. Just 1.1 percent of Twitter users update more than 10 times per day, while 85 percent do so less than once per day; consequently, 5 percent of Twitter users account for 75 percent of its activity.

There’s also a small class of the most popular users: just 0.68 percent have more than 1,000 folllowers, while nearly 94 percent have less than 100 followers. Going the other way, the same trends hold true. 92 percent of users follow less than 100 others, while 0.77 follow more than 1,000. Source

The bottom line: The usage figures throw a little bit of cold water on the idea that Twitter is a huge runaway hit among the wider web public, since apparently it’s really only heavily used by a small percentage of users. The 85 percent that don’t update daily also points to the service having a lot of dropouts or inactive users.

***
SMARTPHONE USERS WANT TO TALK TO THEIR DEVICES, says a new survey sponsored by speech-recognition vendor TellMe Networks. The survey says that three-fourths of people would choose a smartphone with speech-recognition and control features, while a similar majority wouldn’t be uncomfortable speaking commands into their phone in a restaurant.  Source

The bottom line: A survey sponsored by a speech-recognition vendor could hardly be expected to find anything other than interest in the technology, but as the features become more pervasive, awareness and usage would be expected to increase. There certainly are situations when speech commands make sense – in a car, for instance.

***

MORE THAN HALF OF SOCIAL NETWORK USERS HAVE BEFRIENDED A BRAND, says a recent report from eMarketer. Almost as many have said something positive about a brand on a social-networking site, while almost a quarter have said something negative.

The report casts some doubt on the widely held view that people don’t have a lot of interest in conversing with or “friending” companies, brands and products online. Source

The bottom line: While there’s a certain amount of apparent interest among social-networking users – or really, web users in general, in interacting with brands online, these figures shouldn’t be used by marketers as a justification to jump into social networking without a careful plan and strategy. This interest shouldn’t translate into free reign for companies to invade users’ personal online spaces, especially when there’s still a lot of room for them to damage their brands by doing so.

***

INDIA WILL BE A LEADING MOBILE CONTENT MARKET BY 2013, says analyst firm mobileSQUARED, generating $2.37 billion in mobile content revenues then, compared to $835.8 million this year. Additionally, the firm reports that the number of Indian subscribers will grow from 400 million now to 700 million by the end of 2010.

Leading the way in mobile content will be ringback tones, the firm says, with ringtones, graphics and wallpapers making big contributions. One major threat, though: Indian operators’ cut of content revenues, which the company says is normally more than 70% for on-portal content, or content billed through premium SMS. Source

The bottom line: The opportunity on the subcontinent is huge – but will the market move more quickly past the types of content listed above, and on to apps and ad-supported content?

In brief: MSearchGroove proudly steps up to the plate and hosts the Carnival of the Mobilists for the first time.

The last weekend in August and I spent much of it at a two-day summer festival in Siegburg, Germany, where I’m based. I’ve been on a natural high with good friends, great food and a wonderful line-up of home-grown entertainment. But not all the excitement was at the local fairgrounds. The Mobilists have also come up with a mix of thought leadership and must-read posts that give us new perspectives on mobile and start our adrenalin flowing.

Andy Favell and the team at mobiThinking.com do us all a great service and compile a comprehensive list of mobile industry facts and figures. The first in this series focuses on the size of the mobile Web and the implications for marketers. What do the numbers tell us? Should investors/companies take advantage of the economic slowdown and move ahead while others are standing still? Read on, find out and tell us what you think.

Another round of important mobile stats comes from Jose Colucci at Mobile Strategy, who continues the countdown of the 12 Reasons Why Canadian Banks Should Really Offer Mobile Services. Jose expertly brings together figures that show significant growth and penetration (despite strict government regulation, a lack of competition and a sky-high mobile data plans and pricing).  The bottom line: over 70 percent of Canadians have wireless access. Is Canada an untapped market for banking services? Is there a first-mover advantage for financial institutions that get involved? Read on, find out and tell us what you think.

With all the buzz around app stores and the proliferation of mobile devices (beyond just phones), the timing couldn’t be better for this post from Antoine RJ Wright. In it he recounts Nokia’s size, scope and industry influence, and wonders if the Finnish giant has the resources and marketing muscle to sustain three brands/strategies: Ovi, Symbian and Maemo. Could Maemo be the “wild card” in Nokia’s hand? Read on, find out and tell us what you think.

Tsahi Levent-Levi at VoIP Survivor, a blog in RADVISION’s blogs network providing insights into the VoIP industry, connects the dots in recent analysis/commentary and examines the outlook for mobile VoIP. Will current interest among carriers create the conditions for a viable market? Or will it simply advance the shift to IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) – a technology that defines how to set up advanced services for 3G cellular networks – and put operators back in the driver’s seat? Hmmm…should Fring and Truphone watch their backs? Read on, find out and tell us what you think.

A refreshing new idea comes from Judy Breck at Golden Swamp. She uses the debut of  Half the Sky, a new book documenting the plight and progress of the world’s women, to start a long overdue discussion about the impact of mobile on women in the emerging markets. Must women such as Saima Muhammad, a Pakistani woman who routinely beaten by her husband until she started a successful embroidery business, continue to endure their terrible fates in silence? Or does personal mobility offer the promise of liberation and freedom from oppression? What is the outcome when the world’s women have access to the Internet in their pockets? Read on, find out and join in the conversation at Golden Swamp.

Meanwhile, Dennis Bournique at WAP Review uncovers disturbing inequities in the price of mobile data in the developed world. He successfully argues the case for a rethink based on his shocking observation that (currently) all prepaid data is “wildly overpriced.” So, what is fair price for mobile data on prepaid plans? Dennis does the math and provides us a reasonable model that makes money and sense for everyone. Read on, find out and give us your take.

Some eight operating systems are battling for market supremacy. Will there be only one? Digital evangelist Ian Wood (thankfully) moves us past the academic discussion and back to basics in a post that draws from his vast personal experience and road tests. His conclusion: look for consolidation that will see three OS providers emerge. Who will make the winner’s circle? Read on, find out and let us know what you think.

Kudos to C. Enrique Ortiz at About Mobility for asking the question: is Apple a control freak? He connects the dots in recent developments – such as the decision by Apple to reject both Google Voice and Riverturn’s VoiceCentral application – to communicate an uncomfortable truth. But it’s not about whether Apple is morphing into a monopolist; it’s about the larger impact on the ecosystem and the third-party developers that have made iPhone the success it is. What are the arguments (pro and com)? What’s at stake? Read on, find out and speak out!

Finally, MSearchGroove uses COM #189 to showcase Mobile Groove, its new, no-holds-barred podcast series. I join with series co-host Inma Martinez, a leading digital media strategist and advisor to venture capitalists who has been referred to as a “free radical” by Red Herring and Fast Company. Together we raise our goblet of rock and speak out on the rise and demise of Blyk, what went wrong at Spinvox and what we can expect from Microsoft moving forward. Read on, have fun and contact us with your ideas/input! (mobilegroove AT msearchgroove DOTcom)

Post of the week goes to Judy Breck at Golden Swamp for prompting us to see mobile as a tool (for change) rather than a technology. Access to the mobile Internet gives everyone – particularly women suffering in isolation – a voice, allowing them to connect with people and peers who can amplify their message and fight their cause. Thanks, Judy, for reminding us why mobile is amazing and why we must strive to bridge the digital divide.

***

If you’re like me, then use the last days of August to catch up on your reading and check out the Carnival posts we unfortunately missed on MSearchGroove.

COM #186 at allaboutiphone.net (Topics include: what brands want from targeting; U.S. wireless data stats from Chetan Sharma; and a look at whether Europe risks losing its competitive edge in mobile. A highlight: an answer to the question – does Steve Jobs hate the App Store?)

COM #187 hosted by Jamie Wells at mobilestance.com (Topics include: five iPhone apps that could make publishers money; a discussion around the future of paid content; an in-depth look at what a mobile Web OS experience could offer; and an exclusive interview with Blyk.)

COM #188 at Golden Swamp (Topics include: how location adds context to content; a look at the cool new Layar Reality Browser2.0; an analysis of Nokia; and a new take on mobile education.)

Thanks to COM contributors and readers.

Look for the Carnival next week at WIPJam - and be sure to catch up with Caroline Lewko and the great WIPJam team at the next Jam Session on the World Tour: WIPJam@OSiM (Open Source in Mobile), September 16, in Amsterdam.

The bottom line: These results highlight the potential of compelling, relevant and properly targeted messages. In particular, they illustrate how much more likely are consumers are to respond to SMS and MMS ads than simple Internet banners.  Peggy adds: Mobile Advertising Research U.K. confirms this, but there’s also a lot of mileage left in banners. For more on what makes for a great mobile advertising experience and a balanced value chain check back tomorrow for my take on a new-launch Hardees campaign.

***

TOP APPLICATIONS ON THE APPLE APP STORE HAVE MORE THAN 1 MILLION USERS, according to AdMob’s latest Mobile Metrics Report for May 2009. The report found that the most popular free applications in AdMob’s iPhone network generated the majority of usage, with the top 5 percent of applications garnering more than 100,000 users in May, and some apps showing more than 1 million active users.

A further 14 percent of applications had between 10,000 and 100,000 active users, while 54 percent of applications had less than 1,000. AdMob reached 15.1 million unique users through iPhone and iPod touch devices across 2,309 applications in May, with the average user accessing four applications.  44 percent of iPhone ad requests came from devices running the new version 3.0 of the iPhone OS, compared to just 1 percent of iPod touch requests.  Source

The bottom line: These numbers from AdMob underline the ongoing popularity of apps on the iPhone. But they also offer some insight into the potential value of in-app advertising for developers and content providers, since the apps in AdMob’s iPhone network are all free to download, and earn money solely from advertising.

***

SUBSCRIPTION VIDEO AND MUSIC ACCOUNT FOR 40 PERCENT OF MOBILE DOWNLOADS IN THE UK, according to a study from GfK, as the model grows in popularity against pay-per-download sales. The research also states that casual and classic trivia and word games lead the mobile gaming market with 27 per cent of sales, while the budget sector (£3 or less) is also enjoying success through basic and retro games.  It also adds that nine per cent of the mobile tariffs signed up in the UK in Q1 have bundled-in flat-rate data.
Source

The bottom line: This study illustrates the growing popularity of the flat-rate model, both in mobile data access, but also in content subscriptions. Still, the content-subscription model contrasts with the booming pay-per-download app store model.  Will one triumph over the other?

***

AD-FUNDED MMS REVENUES TO HIT $8.7 BILLION by 2014, says Juniper Research in a new Mobile Messaging report.  The report says that annual growth rates are reaching 94%, with SMS and mobile email continuing to dominate the person-to-person (p2p) mobile messaging market.

The report, entitled “Mobile Messaging & IP Evolution”, found that the Far East & China would lead the global ad-funded MMS market by a considerable margin, followed by North America and Western Europe.  The adoption of push MMS and SMS in mature and emerging markets has enabled network operators to support ad-funded voice and SMS tariffs, and combat falling ARPU, while providing brands with new advertising channels. Source

The bottom line: These are bold projections from Juniper.  P2P MMS messaging still has a way to go before it reaches the usage level of SMS, but these projections suggest that MMS advertising could prove to be a lucrative revenue stream in its own right.

***

MORE THAN 60 PERCENT OF MOBILE USERS STILL ONLY USE THEIR HANDSET FOR VOICE AND TEXT, according to a KPMG survey. The survey of 4,190 consumers in 19 countries also says that consumer satisfaction rates with mobile services have increased. Music satisfaction is up to 66 percent, video 52 percent (from just 14 percent), IM 44 percent and live TV 38 percent.

The factors influencing users’ next mobile content purchase, according to the survey are, in order: clarity of pricing, cost, ability to save content, download speed and the ability to try content before purchasing it.  36 percent of respondents said they would accept mobile advertising, while 49 percent said they would accept it in music and 28 percent in games.  Source

The bottom line: The level of acceptance of mobile advertising is encouraging.  However, the headline is arguably the most pertinent point: for over 60 percent of consumers, the mobile internet doesn’t exist and text messaging is the only data application of a mobile device.

***

MOBILE ENTERTAINMENT REVENUES ARE EXPECTED TO GROW 28 PERCENT ON AVERAGE over the next year, according to the Mobile Entertainment Forum’s quarterly Business Confidence Index, up one percent from its last survey.

Content owners are much more optimistic about their revenues, with the anticipated average income up from $6.1 million to $17.1 million.Revenue in Western Europe is expected to be down 10 percent, North American revenues are predicted to be up 8

percent. 81 percent of respondents said they were as confident as last year about the future of their business. Source

The bottom line: This MEF study illustrates a bullish mobile entertainment market, unbowed by the economic climate.  It could be that, aside from the natural obligation towards market confidence, stakeholders believe the purchasing of relatively low cost content through microbilling will remain popular as consumers delay the big ticket items and seek alternative forms of entertainment.

***

APATHY AND PRICE RULE IN NOT SELECTING THE iPHONE, say the latest findings from The NPD Group.  The study showed that the primary reasons consumers do not want to purchase an iPhone are “lack of interest” (55 percent) and “high price” (42 percent).

One in five mobile phone owners say they want to purchase an iPhone, but have not yet done so, and NPD’s report indicates data plan pricing and exclusivity remain key obstacles.  18 percent of consumers who have not purchased an iPhone cited the expense of the data plan, while 21 percent said they didn’t want to switch carriers.  Source

The bottom line: Reasons why Apple’s iPhone isn’t persuading everyone to leave their current carrier and device seem quite simple: they aren’t actually that bothered.  Given the previous data point, which revealed that 60 percent of people only use voice and text, this shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.

***

iPHONE USERS TOP SMARTPHONE LOYALTY ratings, according to a new survey by Crowd Science.  It also says four out of ten BlackBerry and other smartphone users would switch to Apple’s iPhone as their next smartphone purchase.

On the other hand, only 14 percent of non-BlackBerry smartphone users would switch to a BlackBerry for their next purchase. Meanwhile, a huge 82 percent of iPhone users are loyal to the brand. Source

The bottom line: In contrast to the previous report, this one highlights the attitudes of smartphone users who, almost by definition of being smartphone users, care a little more.  The study is as much a study of consumer brand perception, and the iPhone steals the show as expected, but BlackBerry may take note of the small minority who would switch for their next purchase.

***

MORE THAN HALF HAVE MOBILE SECURITY FEARS, according to mobile security specialists, Cloudmark Inc.  The report says mobile spam now affects two in three consumers, more than 50 percent worry about mobile security, and only 7 percent believe the information they send over the phone is secure.

Cloudmark also says the concern about mobile security is detrimentally affecting the adoption of mobile services such as banking and e-commerce, with more than two thirds (69.3%) of consumers stating that they wouldn’t use value-added services such as mobile banking.

Two thirds of consumers (65.9%) have received unwanted or unsolicited messages (spam) on their mobile phone. While a majority of spam messages could simply be seen as a nuisance, 29% of respondents had received malicious spam such as phishing messages, fraud messages or messages containing inappropriate content.  Source

The bottom line: This report highlights the ongoing fears around the security of mobile devices, which will likely become more prevalent as smartphones become more pervasive, and spammers and malware authors pay more attention to mobile. However, we should also remember that the mobile security specialists who produced the report might have a small agenda of their own.

The bottom line: It’s encouraging to see traction for this particular approach to mobile search. Peggy adds: The question remains: Will mobile-only search, which essentially promotes a subset of wealth of content/apps/stuff out there, continue to flourish? Or will it be Web search scenarios, enabled by the usual list of suspects all over again. I have some positive views on the potential of social search in mobile, and share these via podcasts (such as this one) and my contributions to mobile search white papers.

And while we mull over the prospects for mobile search, I invite you to consider the graph below from StatCounter Global Stats (based on aggregate data collected by StatCounter on a sample exceeding 4 billion pageviews per month collected from across the StatCounter network of more than 3 million websites) showing the companies that lead in online search . Charles Knight – my esteemed colleague and the “voice of alternative search” at MSG partner site AltSearchEngines - has launched a contest and asks: What is the one word that best describes Google’s lead? (Google is the read line at the top.) “Alarming” is my pick…

Since AltSearchEngines doesn’t focus on mobile search (which is why we have partnered), allow me to share the StatCounter Global Stat chart for mobile search, and likewise ask your views. Why does Google lead the pack? (Particularly when the mobile experience offered by Google is known to be unsatisfactory…) What do YOU think?

***

OPERA BROWSER EDGES OUT iPHONE IN MAY, according to Web-analytics firm StatCounter.  The Norwegian browser firm Opera Software saw its mobile browser surpass the iPhone’s popularity last month. Based on aggregate data findings on a sample of over 4 billion page views per month, the study said 24.6 percent of Internet pages downloaded to mobile devices went through Opera’s mobile browser, and 22.3 percent through the iPhone. Source

The bottom line: Although Opera would likely have lost out if the iPod Touch had been counted, these figures are still significant. It can also be read as an indicator of BlackBerry’s mobile Internet dominance.  The American smartphone is widely perceived as THE corporate device, so while Internet appetite might wane after some time for the casual user, maybe it’s BlackBerry’s leagues of loyal prosumers that keep Opera that little bit ahead of iPhone.

***

MOBILE ADVERTISING IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $5.7 billion by 2014, according to Juniper Research. The report says a need for customer engagement and a quantifiable return on investment will drive growth in mobile advertising, but brands are still doubtful that “mobile has sufficient reach to warrant substantive ad spend.” 

Mobile will still account for only 1.5 percent of total global ad spend by 2014. Jupiter points out that, although this year will see the mobile Internet become the most popular delivery channel for advertisers, CPCs and CPMs have fallen sharply over the past year.  But there is a bright side: Response rates in mobile advertising remain substantially higher than those in other media. Source

The bottom line: A mix of good and bad news on mobile advertising from Juniper, and another voice supporting changes many in the industry agree are critical:  More engaging mobile advertising campaigns and agreement on key performance indicators and measurement tools. Let’s hope Juniper’s advertising spend proportions are a just a miserly prediction.  Peggy adds: After all, word is – and this was expressed at this week’s Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) event in NYC – that the industry is only waiting for a few solid success stories to drive significant ad spend. More on the mood/news at the MMA event in a special report from Jim Levey, a former mobile advertising executive at Amdocs, whom I am proud to report has joined our roster of authors and correspondents. Jim will be tracking and commenting on mobile advertising industry developments that matter.

***

AVERAGE MOBILE MARKETING BUDGETS WILL INCREASE 26 PERCENT this year, even as overall marketing expenditures decline by 7 percent, according to new Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) research presented at its New York conference. 

But although mobile is fighting against the downward momentum of spending, at 1.8 percent it still only makes up a small fraction of total marketing budgets. The MMA projects that mobile ad spending will grow from $1.7 billion this year to $2.16 billion in 2010.  MMA says SMS campaigns remain the most common at 66 percent, followed by having a mobile Web (53 percent), and mobile email marketing (33 percent). Source

The bottom line:  This research puts a more positive spin on the state of the market (as opposed to Juniper’s rather sobering report above). That mobile marketing spends are going up during a generally down time can only be encouraging.  However, the challenge must remain in convincing brands to dedicate a greater proportion of their budget to an exciting new medium, whether that’s through tried and trusted messaging campaigns, or using richer new mobile media.  Growth and innovative mobile development still needs risk-takers and brave allocation of budget from the big-name brands.

***

GLOBAL MOBILE VIDEO USERS WILL total more than 534 million by 2014, according to a forecast issued by Pyramid Research.  It says a strong percentage of mobile net additions will come from emerging markets. The study adds that mobile video subscribers will rise roughly 8.5 percent by 2014, citing the availability of improved devices and networks as the keys to driving adoption. The Asia Pacific market will lead the mobile video growth spurt, claiming 281 million subscriptions by 2014, and India will also experience a dramatic uptake. Source

The bottom line: Mobile video has only very recently begun to penetrate western markets, thanks to the improved user experience and larger screens available with the latest smartphones.  Although eastern markets are ahead of the game in this respect, and the projections largely focus on these geographies, the predictions still seem bold. The provision of adequate bandwidth and the development of LTE technologies will be critical for the global take-up of mobile video, whether it’s accessed via streaming, downloads, or by accessing the 3G Video Call channel.

***

NOKIA’S POPULARITY IS FADING FAST AMONGST TEENS reports online teen hangout, Habbo Hotel.  A survey asked 112,000 teenagers in 30 countries to choose their top cellphone brand, and just 21 percent of respondents chose Nokia, down from 29 percent last year. Source

The bottom line: The Habbo survey numbers are reported to have excluded key emerging markets (such as India and China, where Nokia is market leader), and may also have had a strong bias towards respondents from America, where Nokia’s market share is much less.  However, there’s probably some truth in the suggestion that Nokia could do with re-energizing their brand for the global youth market.

***

NEARLY 60 PERCENT OF U.S. MOBILE PHONE OWNERS TEXT, with 94 percent of teens the largest user group, and 20-somethings at 87 percent.  So say results from the second annual Vlingo Consumer Mobile Messaging Habits Report. Among those in their 40s, usage jumped from 56 percent in 2008 to 64 percent this year, and for those in their 50s it jumped from 38 percent to 46 percent. The report explains that texting is also gaining on sending/receiving calls as the primary use of mobile phones, with 35 percent of all respondents using their phones for texting more than for calls. Almost half of respondents do both in equal numbers.  Text message volumes have risen across all age groups, although the 13 to 19 age group remains the most active with an average of more than 500 texts per month.  It also claims that more than a quarter of mobile users drive while texting. Source

The bottom line: The rise of messaging in the U.S. appears undaunted in this report, with ever-climbing numbers not always reflecting responsible use of America’s favorite non-voice mobile communication channel.

What to do with a people-powered, user-generated index of the world out there? Follow in Google’s footsteps and sell advertising on top of it.

As I wrote in my last post, GyPSii has cleverly harnessed PlaceMe, a primary function of GyPSii that allows you to create a point of interest (POI), add your content (image, video, audio, text), add your current or last geo-location, categorize/tag/describe the POI, and submit to the server in real time to a personal or publicly designated folder in your MyPlaces (your record of points of interest).

To get this to Google scale, GyPSii needs a lot of people out there indexing the world with their mobile phones. It’s an ambitious strategy, but not far-fetched. Dan’s forecast models tell him that a company with 7 million users, each doing 2 PlaceMes a month would produce an index in the first year that would be “significantly larger than the Google file system in its first year.” (Dan expects GyPSii to be on “between 80 and 100 million devices in the coming 12 months.”)

There are no stats on active users as a percentage of that total. But GyPSii members tend to be hyperactive when it comes to PlaceMe, creating and tagging “15-20 PlaceMes per month.” Every time GyPSii members do that, they are adding a new indexed item to what the company calls the Osmotic File System (OFS).

Where does mobile advertising come in? It’s already work in progress in China. In fact, GyPSii has a lot of progress to report in China – period. As Dan sees it: “To have an ad-based model, you have to have an audience.” To reach more members (and encourage them to index the world around them) GyPSii’s has this week launched the Java version of its application, with both Chinese and English language support.

The expectation, according to the press release, is that the new app will “appeal to the 70 percent of the 650 million phone owners in China who own Java-based phones.” By way of background, GyPSii is already locally available in China for the major operators China Mobile and China Unicom, for download on compatible Java phones.   GyPSii is also available globally across a wide range of devices, including Samsung, Nokia, LG, Apple iPhone, and BlackBerry smartphones.

How does GyPSii plan to make the jump from critical mass to relevant advertising? What is the rev share model for partners (handset makers and carriers) who get on board? And what is the experience for members that use the ExploreMe function to search the world around them (and so trigger the delivery of an ad on their mobile device)? These are just a few of the questions I explored with Dan in this final segment of our podcast interview. (It’s a little longer than my usual interviews, but I felt detail was necessary to fully understand the interplay between search and advertising GyPSii-style.

Listen to the podcast here. [20:27]

Excerpts from the interview:

PEOPLE-POWERED SEARCH: Dan is a great believer (as I am) in social search on mobile. As he pus it: “This is the ultimate user generated content business model ever.” With patented technology in place (as part of the PlaceMe function), the next step is scale. “It’s got to be at scale because if our goal is to build that index, we’ve got to get lots of people to use the app.” Downloading is only part of it. Bundling is the business model that drives results.

WATERFALL MODEL: This model sits at the core of how GyPSii does deals and shares the money. “It starts with OEM manufacturers, and then to ODM manufacturers. So we go and get bundle relationships with them to get on-deck.” After GyPSii seals the deals to be on the phones, “the water falls, [and] the next layer is the carrier layer.”  Then, as you begin to get scale, you use something like Open Experience, the API, to further connect all of the social networks.” And what do handset makers get? Future revenue. As Dan puts it: “If you’re a phone manufacturer, for example, once you sell your phone, it’s a done deal. You have to make a new one and sell it.  We’ve got a business model that enables a phone to be an annuity generating device for a manufacturer, and that’s all the downstream advertising that results out of any given phone. So, that way, every device they make is an investment in a future revenue stream.”

MOBILITY AD DELIVERY: “In selecting GyPSii, they’ve not just selected this app to be bundled; they’ve selected the whole GyPSii back- end system, which also is a contextual search and add delivery system.  So, strategically we’ve been selected for mobility based advertising delivery by some of the world’s largest manufacturers and I think that’s kind of a strategic place to be because they believe in this vision….They understand mobility, [and] they don’t appreciate a top-down play from other companies coming in trying to do a land grab on their customer base.”

ADVERTISING EXPERIENCE: It’s a lot like the mobile search we know, except the index is created by people and the ads – well – don’t look like ads. It all starts with a function called ExploreMe. From the website: “ExploreMe allows you to find places by keyword, category, proximity based across the general public, by your friends in your social network, or limited to your own personal points of interest. The resultant places allow you to see full context of photos, video, audio, text and ratings by the owners, contact the owner of the place (dependent on user settings), allow you to map the place, and with navigation allow you to get to the place.” Essentially, ExploreMe is what Dan calls the first step in “planet search or experience search.” You get search results and ads that are sold into that index in the same way that ads are sold into the Google index.  How do the ads look? A lot like content. But you could also get a coupon. No matter what you get, when you make a selection it triggers an advertising-based transaction – and a pay-off to the handset manufacturer.

MORE THAN MOBILES: Who said mobile advertising has to be delivered to mobile phones? GyPSii’s goal is to be on every device out there. “That’s not just phones, it’s also netbooks. We’ve got a relationship with Intel; we’ve been selected as part of their reference platform for all mobile Internet devices and netbooks.  There are other ways to be mobile besides just your phone, so every mobile device that has an ability to be connected to the Internet, we want to be on.”

MOBILE ANALYTICS: Advertising on a social network (as I have pointed out in my recent release white paper Mobile Advertising For the Masses, sponsored by Bango, which you can download here) provides brands access to key data, such as gender, preference, and whatever else members are willing to share. “For privacy reasons, [GyPSii analytics] will never say who a person is or anything else, but it will report things like gender, age, what other social networks that person is in. Think of a 3-D cluster map of the kind of people that are interested in that product, it helps them [advertisers] in real-time know where they should place their ads.” The feedback loop is simple: “We’ll help them know more about who’s interested in their products.”

WHAT’S NEXT?: “We’ve been in hunting mode and now we go into gathering mode.  So, where are we going? We’re going to continue to hunt relentlessly.  We will not yield until we sign every major OEM and ODM and carrier in the world – that’s hunting.” Execution goes hand-in-hand with innovation. We spoke shortly before the iPhone app launch, which Dan explains in the interview. Beyond that, we can look for a “release schedule that enhances that new user experience on all the other devices we’ve got.” Finally, GyPSii will expand what it calls the GyPSiiPlex, “all the data centers around the world adding capacity and fine tuning our algorithms.” (Dan calls the company’s core algorithm PlaceRank, a word play on PageRank.)

My take: My own mobile advertising research for a variety of projects including Mobile Advertising Research U.K., and MSG’s own publication/online resource MobiAD World Focus, brings me in contact with C-Level executives from a mix of mobile operators, agencies, brands, ad networks, and enablers. The questions on the top of the list: What is the value chain and who are the mouths we have to feed? The advance of companies like GyPSii tells us two things: We have to re-think how we define mobile advertising (Is it about brand message? Or is the end-game for advertisers simply the chance to communicate with social networks like GyPSii?), and the value chain we assume is coming together to deliver it.

Clearly, mobile social networks are making the shift from meeting place to market place, and having search and advertising baked in (in addition to all its other features/functionality) has earned GyPSii a prime position in the emerging mobile search and advertising business ecosystem.

Special thanks (again) to GyPSii for hosting my podcast until I can upload my content to the cloud and make it available to MSG readers via iTunes. It’s work in progress and coming soon!

In the next podcast, I look at a new app store approach from Bytemobile. For background I will also feature the video in the video player in the MSG sidebar.

***

Disclaimer: Bango is an MSG supporter.

The recent report on trends in location-aware apps from Apple’s App Store, Google’s Android Marketplace, and Blackberry’s App World released by Skyhook Wireless, itself a provider of a patented hybrid system of location awareness, reveals a buoyant market for LBS apps. Indeed, the Apple App Store was found to have the greatest number of location-based applications, at over 2,300, and the highest percentage of paid for location apps, at over 75 percent. 67 percent of Blackberry apps are paid, and 80 percent of Android Marketplace apps are free.

Clearly, location apps are popular, as their increasing ubiquity and popularity across a variety of app stores demonstrates. But move past the hype and the excitement generated by the flurry of activity in the space, and it becomes clear that location services – by themselves – are not game-changing.

Location-aware data is not enough

Indeed, mobile location-based services and social networking companies such as Loopt, Pelago, and Sense Networks have invested a great deal to achieve their vision, which revolves around the provision of an array of consumer and community services supported by socially-tagged, location-aware data stores. The data they have is impressive and the expansion plans they pursue are ambitious. However, they also face formidable competition from Internet giants (Google, MySpace, Facebook, and Yelp) that have already aggregated their own large sets of useful social content, and are anxious to extend their reach to mobile.

Can companies compete on location data? Many players are positioning themselves to do just this. However, I submit that location services – and the structures and systems in place to deliver them – represent little more than an incremental innovation on top of the immense stockpiles of location data and content that are largely under the control of established Web companies and heavyweights. As a result, these Web giants are well-positioned to leverage location data to mobilize their offers and ultimately dominate the marketplace. There are, however, options and strategies mobile location services companies can employ to win the game – even though, as I argue in this is column, location services on their own are far from game-changing.

Admittedly, not everyone shares my view. Sam Altman, founder of Loopt, told me in a recent interview that he strongly believes in the value of innovation in location-based services and their central position in personal mobility experiences. A prime example is the company’s iPhone app. Loopt’s Mix feature enables users -without compromising their personal privacy – to connect with other users nearby. What’s more, users can find places nearby on Yelp and find what their friends on Loopt are saying about those places.

Beyond this interesting user experience, Loopt’s location-related content is thin, and therefore isn’t terribly useful – yet. However, it’s not so much the company’s progress with their service offering that interests me as much as its business priorities.

Specifically, Loopt has correctly honed in on two features/functionalities which are fundamental to all location-based services moving forward.

1. Connecting users to each other (using location in addition to other social filtering parameters).
2. Connecting users to information (using location as an additional input to search).

The intersection between location and search on a mobile is particularly promising, and has caught the attention of location services providers including Loopt, Sense Networks (CitySense), and Pelago (Where service), as well as mobile search services providers including ChaCha, a company that connects users to a human agents trained to provide answers to their SMS text search queries and, more recently, voice-activated queries.

However, these players are all pursuing business models built around a broad but rather general vision of what location-based services are – and can be.

In their view, location can be to mobile search and social networking what PageRank currently is to Internet search. Put in this perspective, location is potentially disruptive. What’s more, the companies that control the data stores (thus the capabilities to connect users to information they require, and to each other) are positioned to rock the industry.

Location information is power, both to the companies that deliver it and the consumers, who benefit from the tremendous amount of utility it provides.

Love the restaurant where you just ate? Review it, post it online, and alert everyone (or just your friends) nearby to try the place, all while you’re waiting for the check. Want to find a good barber shop in Mountain View, California? Ask a question, direct it only to users in downtown Mountain View, and be alerted when you receive an answer from someone there. The immediacy, intimacy, relevance, and quality of such services make them very exciting for consumers.

And let’s not forget the potential for the delivery of more relevant, location-aware mobile advertising, which is the main attraction for local stores, clubs, restaurants, businesses, and organizations hoping to attract consumers to their premises.

The location tools and technologies used here to record what we do and where we are (all the while paying careful attention to personal privacy concerns) as part of our day-to-day routine provide advertisers, agencies, and mobile operators a potentially much deeper understanding of consumer habits, insights that can greatly increase the value of mobile advertising linked to location-based services. Mobile contextual advertising is already de rigueur, but location has the potential to make mobile advertising more relevant, more personalized, and thus much more effective.

But it doesn’t stop there. Adding location on top of traditional information sources we know from the Internet provides online companies with further opportunity to personalize content for their users on the move. Location can also boost the quality and value of online recommendations (where the system delivers suggestions based on an implicit understanding of user content preferences and requirements) and search (where an explicit query triggers the delivery of additional related results).

Why location-based services are an incremental innovation

Clearly, location services which connect users to each other, or information, or both have the best chances for success. However, there are several major obstacles that make this a difficult space for companies – particularly startups – to gain traction.

1. Users can resist change: Connecting users to each other and introducing them to new social networking communities could be tough, particularly if they are loyal to the communities where they are already members. The social networking space is already nearing saturation point, at least in the U.S. and the U.K.
2. User-generated content matters: Without a large data store of geotagged content, there is little value to a location-based service. Yelp and CitySearch, companies that have large data stores of reviews, listings, phone numbers, and shop information indexed by location, have the advantage here.
3. Search needs location: Developing effective mobile search will likely require heavy-duty algorithms and design (that factor location and context into the equation), and a large infrastructure to deliver.
4. Google is on an expansion course: Companies – particularly startups – face strong competition from Google. Latitude, a service that allows users to share their location with their friends on GTalk, can be read as Google’s bid for market supremacy. Is Google over-reaching? Not if we consider the company’s ability, through Latitude, to leverage legions of clusters for search to deliver more relevant information culled from a wider data set than any startup could ever stockpile. Furthermore, Google’s dominance in contextual advertising, which it is trying to extend to the mobile space, allows it to reach out to a wide network of advertisers and businesses eager to attract traffic to their sites and tap in to the potentially lucrative Long Tail of search queries. While even Google will have difficulties as it sharpens its focus on selling paid search advertising to the hyperlocal market, its brand recognition and reach may allow it to make considerable inroads and thus pose a significant threat to a broad mix of location services providers and mobile ad networks.
5. Brands need trust: Users are generally not accustomed to sharing their location data with brands and merchants. To convince consumers they trust brands with their personal information, all communications (particularly brand messages delivered via mobile marketing campaigns) will need to be permission-based and comply with the Global Code of Conduct, guidelines introduced by the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA), a global non-profit trade organization established to lead the growth of mobile marketing and its associated technologies. Put another way, brands best positioned to achieve their business objectives, and reach mainstream users instead of just early adopters, are ones that respect our privacy and have our respect. That narrows the candidates down to established big-name brands, companies that we know and trust.
6. Content without consent is spam: The avalanche of new content linked to contextual data (what we do and where) opens the door wide open to the delivery of spam and the spread of fraud. All companies have to do their utmost to attack this problem at the root. However, many startups will likely find they lack the infrastructure to keep this issue in check.

Put another way, making a mark in the location services space requires more than the ability to pick up on a user’s location. Location services require the professional and reliable interplay of systems and services enabling search, content delivery and discovery, social networking and communication, and mobile marketing and advertising. What’s more, players in this space must connect and collaborate with a complex value chain that includes advertisers, enablers, operators, consumers, and companies we have yet to identify.

Given these factors, the players that emerge dominant in this market are likely to be the names we know from the Internet: Facebook, MySpace, Google, and Yelp. Why? Because, as I have pointed out: It’s not about location; it’s about the data and the networks that power location services. Internet giants have experience, communities, content, and search. Location is just another ingredient they can add to their already successful recipe for success. Put simply, location serves as an additional input, paving the way for these companies to provide interesting new applications – applications that fundamentally leverage the assets already out there on the Web.

Smart strategies for clever newcomers

It may be a bleak picture that I paint for mobile location companies and startups; I would like to point out that I am a believer in the vision behind location based services. However, given my experience and common sense, I cannot ignore the barriers that prevent newcomers from changing the game.

But there are actions startups can take to ensure they nonetheless secure a central spot in the merging location services value chain. It may require a rethink, but the potential rewards make it well worth the effort.

I would therefore suggest startups refocus their strategy to bring more value to users, boost their competitiveness in the process. I would advise executing one of the following options:

1. Mashup: tackle the “cold start” problem and build up your data store (and follow the lead of services such as Loopt and Where) by providing content from larger Web services such as Yelp, Evite, Eventbrite, and CitySearch. It’s a great way to connect your users to valuable information immediately. What’s more, there’s an opportunity for one or two location-based “data aggregators” – companies that use information from other services and present it via a unified interface on the mobile device. (However, there is only room for a few companies in this space since the barriers to entry are low and little prevents Internet giants from entering the mobile space (on their own) themselves. Yelp and Google lead the group of Internet companies staking out their mobile territory by releasing location-aware apps for the iPhone and Android devices. A successful play in this niche would therefore require companies to outmaneuver both the mashups offered by other competitors aiming to be data aggregators and the individual siloed applications offered by the Internet companies that have the data and determination to play in mobile.
2. Killer search: It may seem unlikely, but search can be decisive and disruptive, particularly as the integration of location information will likely cause a seismic shift in how users interact with the results they receive on their mobile phone. Keep in mind that, when Google began promoting their brand of search engine, observers joked that the race had already been run and won by the likes of Lycos, HotBot, Yahoo, and AltaVista. My message: If a company makes a fundamental improvement in search by using location data, it would represent a sea-change in contextual search and shift the balance of power away from the current market leaders.
3. Big money: Location can enhance the value and effectiveness of advertising and marketing, adding a new dimension to how companies communicate their brand message to consumers. It may even be possible to use location information to provide better advertising that will appeal to users. As this recent post on MSearchGroove points out: Advertising is indeed content. Location can enable the delivery of truly compelling content. At the other end of the spectrum, we might ask ourselves if it is not possible that location could even pave the way for a whole new paradigm around the effective monetization of content and services that does not involve ad-funding. The value of receiving the right information at the right time and in the right context may be so valuable that people will pay for it.

In conclusion, a bright future awaits location services startups that think outside the box. Granted, it’s a tough market with ever tougher competition, but a strategy built on one (or all) of the options I present will help startups stand up to the Internet giants. I strongly believe location and location-based services are the future. I enjoy hearing about scrappy, ambitious startups, and their success should encourage all companies in this space to execute on the strategies I have outlined. The strategies may vary but the pay-off is clear: Companies that position themselves now to leverage the power of location will lead the way in delivering contextual relevance across mobile search, mobile advertising, and a potentially lucrative range of mobile services we cannot even imagine.

About the author:

Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/njanewit
Nate Janewit is a search and mobile technologist and a Silicon Valley resident. His career thus far has spanned Microsoft, Google, Kosmix, Efficient Frontier, and research in Japan and at Stanford. He is an analyst of emerging technology and media and actively contributes to developments in the search and search advertising space.

The bottom line: As illustrated numerous times within this section, the data dominance and superior browsing experience allowed by smartphones is undeniable.  Making mobile Web user experience smooth, easy, and compelling – as these handsets often do – is shown to consistently drive mobile data traffic.  That many consumers probably can’t tell and don’t care about the difference between mobile websites and HTML sites is also testament to technical developments.

***

GARTNER SAYS THE NUMBER OF MOBILE PAYMENT users will increase by 70 percent this year.  Its report claims that 73.4 million users of mpayment in 2009 would represent a leap of 70.4 percent from 2008.  By 2012, it says mobile payment will reach more than 190 million, more than 3 percent of total mobile users worldwide, attaining a level at which it will be considered “mainstream.”

Gartner defines a mobile payment as paying for a product or service using mobile technology such as a short message service (SMS), Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD), and Near Field Communication (NFC). It includes transactions that use cash, bank accounts or debit and credit cards, as well as non-carrier stored value accounts, such as travel cards, gift cards or PayPal. It does not include transactions that use mobile operators’ billing systems, such as purchase of mobile content or telebanking by mobile to the service center via an interactive voice response (IVR) system. Source

The bottom line: Although the definition of mobile payment is ambiguous here, these figures demonstrate that the mass market is slowly growing confident in using their mobile to pay for and transfer money.  Much effort has been made to foster consumer confidence in the micropayment mobile payment space, and the adoption of mobile banking technologies still varies drastically from region to region.  There are regulatory and security challenges to overcome, particularly with the emergence of NFC technologies, but these figures give strong reason for hope.

***

SPEECH APPLICATIONS ARE TO TRIPLE by 2014 according to a new Datamonitor report. The report claims that as we get used to using mobile computing devices in ‘hands-busy’, ‘eyes-busy’ environments, speech recognition technologies are expected to gain considerable traction. The global market for advanced speech recognition (ASR) in mobile handsets will increase from $32.7 million in 2009 to $99.6 million in 2014. Meanwhile ASR in-vehicle telematics is expected to grow from $64.3 million in 2009 to 208.2 million by 2014. Source

The bottom line: An exciting array of new voice applications has been promised for some time now, without seeming to gain mass market adoption.  This Datamonitor report suggests the market is still full of potential, and with technologies emerging to intuitively allow users to control device functionality with their voice, these projections may herald the beginning of significant penetration.

Peggy adds: A space to watch is voice-activated mobile search, where “Just say what you want,” the guiding principle of voice search to avoid complex and confusing navigation, and to provide a shortcut to information (in the network) and services (on the mobile device) the user wants, is particularly compelling.

***

OPERA’S MINI BROWSER RECORDED MORE THAN 23.4 million users worldwide in April, a jump of 140 percent from the same period one year ago. Page views in America grew 129 percent over the last year; unique users grew 11.8 percent; and there was an average of 198 page views per user in April. U.S. carrier subscribers are said to be viewing more data-intensive pages than those in any other country. Opera said the average page viewed is about 32KB compressed (almost 320KB uncompressed).

Top 10 sites accessed via Opera Mini in the U.S., by number of unique users:

1. Google.com
2. Facebook.com
3. MySpace.com
4. Wikipedia.org
5. YouTube.com (up from 7)
6. Yahoo.com
7. NYTimes.com (down from 5)
8. AccuWeather.com
9. My.Opera.com
10. ESPN.com

Source

The bottom line: The mobile Internet is continuing to see heavy usage and mass adoption, although we should remember these figures are largely coming from BlackBerry handsets operating Opera. The handsets do have massive appeal, as clearly does mobile Internet content.  However, we might also remember that, as a corporate device of choice, their users may not always be paying the bills

***

AN AENEAS STRATEGY STUDY OF U.K. ATTITUDE TOWARDS mobile advertising found that 64 percent of consumers would grant permission to receive mobile advertising if they were incentivized.  The majority of the 1,002 consumers surveyed had a more negative initial attitude, but this changed if advertising was made relevant (65 percent positive), permission was asked (67 percent positive), or if the consumer was in control (69 percent positive). It placed mobile amongst the most popular traditional media (print, outdoor, and television) and above the Internet and radio. 

The research also revealed that 52 percent claim engagement with the brands they love is important, five advertisements per day is most accepted by consumers, 52 percent of consumers doesn’t mind listening to a brand message while waiting for someone to pick up the phone, and 54 percent would send an interesting offer they have received to  friends and family

Tarik Fawzi, of Aeneas Strategy Consulting and Management, commented: ”The consumer research shows some unexpected results regarding consumer attitude towards mobile advertising. Also mobile is compared with other media. This shows consumers know what they want and are open towards mobile advertising, if it is offered on their terms.” Source

The bottom line: This study shows once again that relevancy and control of mobile advertising are critical to its consumer acceptance and success.  The challenge mobile advertising faces is in making campaigns relevant, and offering control, but still maintaining a strong enough number of eyeballs to keep brands spending.

Peggy adds: This consumer research will also be discussed during Mobile Advertising U.K. (June 15 in London), when MSG, which was commissioned to research and write the report in collaboration with Aeneas, will present key findings from interviews with 15+ industry executives and influencers.

***

41 PERCENT OF U.S. CONSUMERS ARE LIKELY TO PURCHASE a multimedia handset with a data plan as their next phone, says a new study by the Yankee Group. BlackBerry and Apple are the top two brands, considered by 44 percent and 30 percent of prospective buyers, respectively.

Meanwhile, in enterprise, the same analyst claims that 75 percent of small to medium businesses anticipate some reduction in their business technology investments due to the economy. End-user software and hardware are the two areas that will experience the biggest budget cuts. Source

The bottom line: These two nuggets from Yankee illustrate the ongoing consumer affair with smartphones, and the rich data consumption experience they allow, in the face of predictable technology cutbacks which the environment has imposed on smaller businesses. It’s tough out there, but consumers remain enthused about compelling mobile data experiences, if the data plan is right.

Notice anyone missing? Service providers and mobile operators.

In fact, their absence in this line-up tells us these players are either content to leave it to the handset makers and Internet giants (a first step on a slippery slope to being a dumb pipe perhaps?), or are simply oblivious to the vast arsenal of capabilities at their disposal, capabilities such as customer relationship data, personalization technologies, and location information that allow them to fight back. In my view, if these players could open up to make all the above available to developers (in a standardized, no-brainer way), then they would cover the bases to be much more than just another application store. With their reach and resources, operators and service providers could be the super shopping malls of the mobile Internet.

Last week I explored this in a post that outlined how Qualcomm and its Plaza Mobile Internet platform potentially change all the rules, levelling the playing field and allowing operators and brands to play a central role in this brave new Open Web. This week I’m back with an exclusive look at Amdocs, a company preparing to take the wraps off an application store platform that ups the ante. Thanks to Jessica Francisco, Amdocs account manager at Weber Shandwick for reaching out, and thanks to Idan Carmeli, Business Development Manager, Amdocs Interactive, for giving MSG the inside track on the company’s app store strategy.

Idan’s controversial yet correct observation: Service providers must learn how to leverage third-party developers. “The biggest question that should be on operators’ minds is: How do I convince developers to use me and not any other of the app store channels that are available in the market?”

The answer: Operators must open up and offer their assets – their customer billing relationship, their customer information, their ability to deliver content personalized to customer segments, and their network capabilities – to developers. “Operators know how to sell content and bill for it. Now they have to be open to third-parties and give them the tools they need to sell to their customers.”

An excerpt of our Q&A:

Q: Some call the app store model the killer model. Google et al have app stores in place, what is the impact on off-portal?

A: It accelerates the move to off-portal, which isn’t good news for service providers. But there is another side to this. The increased interest of consumers in finding cool content and apps means it’s a good place for operators to be [in the middle of this exchange] if they can find ways to better monetize this marketplace.  We’re helping service providers create an environment – an ecosystem similar to what we’ve seen from Google and Apple – that leverages their [service provider's] unique assets to bring developers and application providers on board.

A: There is nothing written about your app store platform and offer at this time. What can you tell us about it?

Q: We will be formally launching this new solution [at WC 2009] next week in Barcelona, along with other Amdocs Interactive offerings. The app store is a platform that allows service providers to, on the one hand, provide tools for developer communities to create applications, and, on the other hand, gives them [developers] a channel to present these apps on the content store. So there are two sides: One, a commerce platform and all the enablers on top of the commerce platform that are derived from our acquisition of Qpass that allow developers to create, upload an application to an existing content store, define how much they want to sell it for, sign the contract with the service provider for the revenue share – the works. Two, the tools for developers to actually build applications that aren’t just generic applications because they can access service providers’ services, such as SMS, WAP access and location as well as other available customer information . The aim is to connect all this – in a convenient way — into developer toolkits that are provided by the service providers to the developers to help them build applications they can later sell through the [service provider's] app store channel.

Q: Does the application store come with apps to start? Or do you help service providers populate it with apps so they have something to sell from the get-go?

A; As part of Amdocs, we have our own framework in place for working with third parties in the mobile start-up arena and we have a framework for building relationships and creating a channel between the start-up community and the innovator community on behalf of our customers.  So, we can leverage these relationships and all these start-ups that are part of our program in order to populate an app store. It’s not the focus of our solution, but we can facilitate this.

Q: So you offer the nuts and bolts for an app store. But I also know that you have mobile search and personalization capabilities – through ChangingWorlds, for example – that could potentially make this a self-learning storefront…

A: Definitely. Our ultimate vision for everything we do in Amdocs Interactive is to bring to market solutions that leverage all our assets. So eventually we will want to embed relevant capabilities in our app store solution. For example, we recognize that personalizing the app store experience for the consumer is an important value-add for both the developer and the consumer as it solves the relevancy issue that’s causing real pains for third-party developers on other mobile platforms.

Q: In other words, developers might pay a premium to content providers for the ability to target individual consumers? What would the deal look like?

A: It would be the service provider saying to the developer ‘you have this app that certain consumers are more likely to appreciate than others, so let’s make a deal and I’ll make sure the apps consumers see are the ones most relevant. Something like that could be reflected as a premium in the revenue share model between the service provider and the application provider. But first service providers should get where they want to go, and that is being able to launch an app store as quickly as possible because nobody is waiting for them.

Q: A devil’s advocate question here: What is the USP of an app store run by a service provider? Apple and Google have a lot of mindshare already…

A: When opening up to third-parties, service providers  actually create an edge for themselves by creating an edge for their partners. Our app store is not just a content store, but  an end-to-end process and a set of tools for developers that allows them to offer apps to users in a way that they find compelling because they are personalized, or location-aware, or indicate presence, or simply build on the history of the consumer relationship because the developer has access to this data. That’s an edge Google can’t provide its developers.

Of course, the sharing of customer data would take place in a secure and controlled fashion because these are big issues. And let’s not forget reach. If I’m making a choice to develop something, say, for the Palm Pre platform, , I had to take into account it’s not that big a platform yet in terms of how many users are using that. But if I go to AT&T, I have a subscriber base of upwards of 70 million customers. This is scale the service provider needs to learn how to leverage and offer to third-party developers.

Q: Let’s talk about some business basics. What is the monetization model and where does mobile advertising fit in?

A: The basic monetization scheme is the revenue share from the download of the application.  On top of that the mobile operator can charge for the value-ads we identified, such as placement on the store, perhaps boosted by mobile advertising across the network, as well as access to personalization information. It’s easy to imagine a number of models. In one scenario, it’s an 80/20 split in favour of the developer for the basic upload and distribution through the store. But the operator could take 25 percent for better placement, or 30 percent for better personalization. Lots of business models are possible.

It all comes back to the core assets. Once service providers can make it easy for developers to do business with them, then there’s basically no one better placed than a mobile operator to monetize these apps. They know their customer base better than anyone, and that includes Facebook, Google and even Apple.

Q: What about the developer? What capabilities do you offer them to help monetize their apps? I could imagine top of the list would be mobile analytics and some visibility into sales and mobile advertising campaigns…

A: Definitely. In fact, in the very first concept mock-up that we developed for our product, the most prominent feature on the developer profile page – the page where the developer manages himself — is a dashboard of revenue and usage performance for his applications.  For us, this is an important piece of what the service provider needs to offer developers so they’ll come to their [service providers'] platform.

Q: What about mobile search? A gripe I hear is that people can’t find the apps they want. You have mobile search within Amdocs, are you going to use it to make shipping in your app store less of a chore?

A: Yes, search is absolutely part of our roadmap – that and our personalization capabilities will be part of the app store.  But there is more than that: Amdocs is also an established BSS player and systems integrator,  and we’re priming our solution to best leverage the differentiation potential of the customer data, the customer billing and the business intelligence that’s coming from the BSS.

Q: What about the marketing and the branding? Is it powered by Amdocs? And who gets the developers on board? Amdocs or the operators?

A: Good questions. I think we’re going to collaborate with our customers on this. In the case of making sure that everyone hears about their (service providers’] app platform, it’s ultimately going to be the responsibility of our customers to communicate the app store and why it’s a good proposition.

Q: A big picture question: Is it too late for mobile operators to join that app party? I mean we already have Apple, Google, all the big names…

A: We’re seeing increased interest from our customers because they realize they have to be in on this. They have to be on that train before it leaves the station.

Q: It hasn’t left already?

A: Everybody else is announcing app stores.  Any service provider that goes to the market now, it’s not going to be the first; it’s not going to be the second. But any service provider that enters the market now will need to offer an app store. It’s table stakes.

It’s all about the future of the mobile industry. It’s time [for service providers] to seriously bring partners into their business. That’s that bigger issue at play here. If you look at other examples, such as Amazon in the retail industry, it gets this. It’s a retailer with an online store. But with its Amazon Web Services offering, it’s suddenly become more than that. Now you can ask yourself: What does a retailer have to do with providing computing services to developers and application providers?  It’s only when you dig a little bit into that that you realize that if you want to make sure that your business keeps growing and expanding and capitalizing on 100 percent of the opportunities that you have, then you have to learn how to work with partners in the best way possible.

My take: I am reminded here of The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability, a must-read business book by Marco Iansiti, the David Sarnoff Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. In it he points out that scale, once an expression of internal operational and innovative capabilities, is fast becoming a measure of external resources and reach. Put simply, size is about “exerting influence over vast networks of companies and managing assets you don’t own.” All the big names – Microsoft, Google, Nokia, eBay and Amazon – are giants because they pursue a kind of keystone strategy that not only aggressively furthers their own interests but also promotes their ecosystems’ overall health. They have become undisputed market leaders because they appreciated the positive impact their platforms could have on their business ecosystems – and took steps to help other businesses in their ecosystem achieve high performance. This in turn has paved the way for sustainable results over decades.

Mobile operators should borrow a page from this winning strategy and leverage the broad range of content and capabilities available in their business ecosystems to improve the end user experience. Concretely, mobile operators should create platforms in the form of services, tools, or technologies and allow other members of the mobile content and services ecosystem free access.

With companies such as Amdocs and Qualcomm lining up to do just this -in the case of Qualcomm, it’s initially more about widgets -  it’s clear that Google, Apple, Nokia, Samsung, Microsoft and Handango (RIM) could get some serious company. We don’t have implementations yet – but we do have platforms that cover the bases to help operators gain a competitive position in the center of this value Web (NOT chain – that’s old school thinking)…